2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 510 kg more than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (265 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
| Model | TrailBlazer | KB |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3165 cc |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1670 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 17.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 75 L |
