2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 5,513 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 80 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz S (830 Nm) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (373 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2008 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | TrailBlazer | S |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 5513 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 830 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 90 L |