2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2008 MG ZT
To start off, 2008 MG ZT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2008 MG ZT. (256 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2008 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 540 kg more than 2008 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 MG ZT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 MG ZT (410 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (373 Nm). This means 2008 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2008 MG ZT | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | TrailBlazer | ZT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 410 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 65 L |