2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP) has 132 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | TrailBlazer | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2490 mm |