2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. (210 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2011 Saab 03-Sep.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Saab 03-Sep. (299 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | TrailBlazer | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 299 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4689 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1529 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2675 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 62 L |