2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (211 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 630 kg more than 2012 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi TT. (349 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | TrailBlazer | TT |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 349 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 60 L |