2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer has manual transmission. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | TrailBlazer | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 1867 mm |