2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos

To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2013 Volkswagen Eos. (197 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2013 Volkswagen Eos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 585 kg more than 2013 Volkswagen Eos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volkswagen Eos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volkswagen Eos. (281 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volkswagen Eos.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer 2013 Volkswagen Eos
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model TrailBlazer Eos
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type SUV Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4163 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 275 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 373 Nm 281 Nm
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 102 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 9.6:1
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1595 kg
Vehicle Length 5280 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1791 mm
Vehicle Height 1920 mm 1443 mm
Wheelbase Size 3280 mm 2578 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 12.4 L/100km 6.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.7 L/100km 9.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 55 L