2004 Chrysler 300 vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2004 Chrysler 300 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 6,057 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 342 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 1308 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler 300 | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | 300 | Elite |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6057 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1888 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 29 L |