2004 Chrysler 300 vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Chrysler 300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,057 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 437 kg more than 2004 Chrysler 300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler 300 (569 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler 300 | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6057 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 569 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1888 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3510 mm |