2004 Chrysler 300 vs. 2006 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Nissan Armada is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,555 cc, 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 94 kg more than 2006 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler 300. (339 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler 300 | 2006 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | 300 | Armada |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3516 cc | 5555 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1624 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 106 L |
