2004 Chrysler 300 vs. 2008 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,598 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2008 SsangYong Chairman W. (247 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2008 SsangYong Chairman W.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 SsangYong Chairman W (343 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler 300. (339 Nm). This means 2008 SsangYong Chairman W will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler 300 | 2008 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
Model | 300 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 343 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |