2004 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Lexus LS
To start off, 2010 Lexus LS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus LS (380 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus LS weights approximately 301 kg more than 2004 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lexus LS (497 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler 300. (339 Nm). This means 2010 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Lexus LS | |
Make | Chrysler | Lexus |
Model | 300 | LS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 497 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1624 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1875 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2969 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 84 L |