2004 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (225 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 176 kg more than 2004 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor (345 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler 300. (339 Nm). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 300 | Endeavor |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3516 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 345 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1624 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4846 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1869 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1768 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 81 L |
