2004 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC70. (240 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 257 kg more than 2004 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler 300 (339 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo XC70. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo XC70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler 300 | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | 300 | XC70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 320 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1624 kg | 1881 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |