2004 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-09 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 438 kg more than 2004 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (366 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler 300. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda CX-09 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | 300 | CX-09 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3516 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1624 kg | 2062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 76 L |
