2004 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Concorde | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Concorde | XK |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2600 mm |