2004 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1962 Maserati 151

To start off, 2004 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 3,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati 151 (355 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Concorde. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Concorde. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 680 kg more than 1962 Maserati 151.

Because 1962 Maserati 151 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati 151. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Maserati 151 (487 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Concorde. (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 1962 Maserati 151 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Concorde. 2004 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1962 Maserati 151 has manual transmission. 1962 Maserati 151 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: