2004 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 2,735 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Concorde (258 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Concorde | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Chrysler | Chevrolet |
Model | Concorde | Aveo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2735 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 155 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 46 L |