2004 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2012 Ford F-350

To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Concorde. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Concorde.

Because 2012 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Concorde. (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Concorde.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chrysler Concorde 2012 Ford F-350
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Concorde F-350
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2735 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 190 HP 385 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 258 Nm 548 Nm
Torque RPM 4850 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Vehicle Length 5280 mm 6269 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 2029 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1961 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 3967 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 132 L