2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 48 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Chrysler | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Crossfire | 6C |
Year Released | 2004 | 1938 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 77 L |