2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 776 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chrysler | DAF |
| Model | Crossfire | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 53 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1441 kg | 665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 33 L |
