2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1962 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 941 kg more than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1962 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | Crossfire | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1441 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2060 mm |
