2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1967 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (210 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1967 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1967 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 1033 kg more than 1967 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1967 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Crossfire | Seven |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 29 L |
