2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1969 Humber Sceptre
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1969 Humber Sceptre. (82 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1969 Humber Sceptre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 449 kg more than 1969 Humber Sceptre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Humber Sceptre. (123 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1969 Humber Sceptre | |
| Make | Chrysler | Humber |
| Model | Crossfire | Sceptre |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1723 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1441 kg | 992 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
