2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 207 kg more than 1974 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (340 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | Crossfire | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |