2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1976 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 246 kg more than 1976 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1976 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Crossfire | Mark II |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1441 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2590 mm |