2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1239 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Crossfire | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1509 kg | 2748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 107 L |
