2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (330 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Audi |
| Model | Crossfire | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Top Speed | 255 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2550 mm |
