2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (330 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 684 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1982 Skoda L | |
Make | Chrysler | Skoda |
Model | Crossfire | L |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 68.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1509 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 38 L |