2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. (310 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Crossfire | M25 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 363 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
