2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1990 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 131 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire.
Because 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 1990 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | Crossfire | Continental |
Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1509 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2780 mm |