2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7

To start off, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 150 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-7.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (340 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-7.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chrysler Crossfire 1996 Mazda RX-7
Make Chrysler Mazda
Model Crossfire RX-7
Year Released 2004 1996
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3196 cc 2616 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 215 HP 238 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 340 Nm 296 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1452 kg 1302 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2430 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 77 L