2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. (210 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 53 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Crossfire | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2945 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.4:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.9 seconds | 5.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |