2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (330 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cadenza. (290 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cadenza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 66 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire.
Because 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Chrysler | Kia |
| Model | Crossfire | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 290 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1509 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2845 mm |
