2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. (310 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Crossfire | XF |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 600 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.9 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |