2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2012 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Korando is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (210 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2012 SsangYong Korando. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2012 SsangYong Korando.
Because 2012 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | 2012 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
| Model | Crossfire | Korando |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 175 HP |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.9 seconds | 10 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
