2004 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2012 Volvo C30

To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 12 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.

Because 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Crossfire.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chrysler Crossfire 2012 Volvo C30
Make Chrysler Volvo
Model Crossfire C30
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3199 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 0 HP
Torque 310 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1400 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1463 kg 1451 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4252 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1783 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1448 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 60 L