2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3690 mm |
