2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager (145 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1443 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1943 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 66 L |
