2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1976 TVR M
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR M would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1976 TVR M.
Because 1976 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1976 TVR M | |
Make | Chrysler | TVR |
Model | Grand Voyager | M |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2290 mm |