2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher.
Because 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Grand Voyager | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2850 mm |