2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2001 Holden GTS
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden GTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden GTS would be higher. At 4,144 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden GTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden GTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden GTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden GTS (692 Nm) has 474 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (218 Nm). This means 2001 Holden GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2001 Holden GTS | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Grand Voyager | GTS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 4144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 692 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |