2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2002 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Colt |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2351 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
