2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager (145 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager (218 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Grand Voyager | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 46 L |