2004 Chrysler LHS vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, both 2004 Chrysler LHS and 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler LHS (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 171 kg more than 2004 Chrysler LHS.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler LHS (327 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler LHS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler LHS | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | LHS | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 327 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 78 L |