2004 Chrysler LHS vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler LHS. (250 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler LHS.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler LHS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler LHS. (327 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler LHS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler LHS | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | LHS | Calais |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 327 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |