2004 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 250 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 515 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.

Because 2004 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Pacifica. (340 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Pacifica. 2004 Chrysler Pacifica has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chrysler Pacifica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: