2004 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 820 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica (340 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Pacifica | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Pacifica | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 80 L |
