2004 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2006 Isuzu I-280
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica (340 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chrysler Pacifica | 2006 Isuzu I-280 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Isuzu |
| Model | Pacifica | I-280 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 2770 cc |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 74 L |
